Stablecoin B2B Volume in 2026: The Data

Venly Finance | Updated September 30, 2026

Real stablecoin payments volume reached ~$390B in 2025, of which ~$226B was B2B: a +733% YoY jump (BCG, Jan 2026). Headline $33T on-chain settlement includes exchange, DeFi, and bot flows. Juniper separately estimates cross-border B2B stablecoin flow at $13.4B in 2026, rising to $5T by 2035.

This is a data reference page tracking stablecoin B2B and payments-related volume as reported by industry analysts in 2025–2026. Every headline number is sourced; corridor and issuer splits are labeled as estimated where the underlying source publishes ranges rather than point figures. Last verified: 2026-07-02.

Headline numbers (2026)

What "payments volume" means (methodology)

Analysts split on-chain stablecoin activity into three buckets: exchange trading (largest bucket, not counted here), DeFi collateral movement (also excluded), and payments-related: real economic transfers between distinct parties for goods, services, payroll, or settlement. The $6–8T figure is BCG's payments-related estimate; it is smaller than raw on-chain volume figures you may see elsewhere.

B2B vs consumer split

Consumer stablecoin activity (remittances, retail savings in high-inflation economies, on-chain purchases) accounts for a meaningful share, but B2B (supplier payments, marketplace payouts, treasury movements) is the segment growing fastest in 2025–2026. Multiple analysts converge on B2B as roughly 35–45% of payments-related volume with a rising trajectory.

Corridor concentration

Public data on corridor-level volume remains estimated rather than audited. Reported concentration:

CorridorNotes
US ↔ LATAMLargest single corridor; USDC dominant; strong marketplace/PSP use.
Intra-APACFast-growing; USDT dominant on Tron; growing USDC share on newer chains.
EU ↔ MENARising; EURC and USDC both used; MiCA closure creates a filter on issuers.
US ↔ APACConsistent B2B corridor for supplier payments.

Issuer share (2026)

Growth vs 2024/2025

Payments-related volume roughly quadrupled from 2024 to 2026 by BCG's methodology; the doubling of MiCA-eligible EUR stablecoin supply year-over-year is the sharpest sub-trend. Corporate treasury adoption (holding operating cash in stablecoin) is the leading indicator most analysts watch for 2027.

What to expect in 2027

Source table

MetricValueSourceLast verified
Total payments-related volume 2026$6–8T annualizedBCG "Stablecoins: Five Killer Tests," Jan 20262026-07-02
Total stablecoin supply~$260BCircle State of USDC 2026; DeFiLlama2026-07-02
USDC monthly on-chain volume$1T+Circle State of USDC 20262026-07-02
SWIFT cross-border flows 2025~$150T annualSWIFT annual data disclosure2026-07-02
B2B share of payments volumeEstimated 35–45%BCG Jan 2026; Visa on-chain analytics2026-07-02
Stablecoin payments growth (2024 → 2026)~4–5×BCG Jan 20262026-07-02

How it works

  1. Analysts pull raw on-chain transfer data from indexers (Artemis, Allium, DeFiLlama).
  2. They classify wallets and flows by heuristic (exchange, DeFi, payments) to isolate payments-related activity.
  3. Payments activity is further split by counterparty type (B2B vs consumer) and corridor using KYT and geo signals.
  4. Estimates are cross-referenced against issuer disclosures (Circle, Tether, Paxos, SG-FORGE).
  5. Ranges are published where methodology diverges: treat point figures as estimates, ranges as more reliable.

Reader questions

How is 'payments volume' separated from trading volume?

Analysts classify wallets using heuristics: CEX and DEX addresses are tagged and their volume excluded from the payments bucket. What remains is transfers between wallets that look like real economic activity: payroll, supplier payments, marketplace payouts, remittances. Methodology varies between BCG, Juniper, and Visa; BCG's Jan 2026 whitepaper is the source used here.

Which stablecoin is used most for B2B?

USDC is disproportionately represented in B2B payouts. It dominates the corporate treasury and licensed-institution use cases, especially in the US and EU. USDT has larger overall volume but skews toward trading and consumer flows, particularly on Tron. EURC leads euro-denominated B2B post-MiCA.

How much of the volume is EU-based?

Precise EU-attributed volume is estimated rather than audited. Public analyst reports suggest single-digit-percent share of global stablecoin payments today, growing after MiCA's transitional period closed on 30 June 2026. EURC volume is a good leading indicator for EU B2B activity.

Are these numbers audited?

No. Stablecoin volume analytics are analyst estimates built on on-chain data and heuristics, not audited financials. Issuer supply figures (USDC, EURC) come from monthly attestations. Payments-vs-trading splits and corridor breakdowns are estimates, and we label them as such throughout.

How fast is B2B stablecoin volume growing?

Payments-related volume grew roughly 4–5× between 2024 and 2026 per BCG's methodology. B2B is the fastest-growing sub-segment within that. The doubling of MiCA-eligible EUR stablecoin supply year-over-year is one of the sharpest sub-trends.